Ingreso ciudadano y equidad de género : una defensa repúblicana
Loading...
Publication date
Advisors
Department
Research group
Center
Abstract
En este trabajo defendemos, en clave republicana, la pertinencia
del Ingreso Ciudadano para mitigar, más adecuadamente que otras
medidas focalizadas, las inequidades de género propias del sistema capitalista.
Sostenemos que es la única medida disponible capaz de afectar
simultáneamente lo que consideramos los dos principales ámbitos de
dominación patriarcal-patrimonial: el doméstico y el empresarial. Nuestra
defensa republicana consiste en promover, dentro de los estudios de género,
la incorporación del concepto de dominación, al permitir éste salvar las
confusiones que generan las más conocidas dicotomías conceptuales,
como la de producción/reproducción, irrelevante políticamente, y la de
público/privado, con frecuencia utilizada a-histórica y a-institucionalmente.
Based on a republican conception, we defend Citizen Income [Ingreso Ciudadano] as a superior way, relative to other targeted measures, to mitigate the gender inequalities that are characteristic of capitalism. We pose that Citizen Income is the only available measure that is capable of simultaneously affecting what we take to be the two main sites of patriarchal-patrimonial domination: the domestic and corporate domains. Our republican argument promotes the inclusion of the concept of domination in gender studies, since that concept allows to solve the confusions that the best-known conceptual dichotomies generate, such as the production/reproduction dichotomy, which is politically irrelevant, and the public/private one, which is often used in an ahistorical way and lacking an institutional foundation.
Based on a republican conception, we defend Citizen Income [Ingreso Ciudadano] as a superior way, relative to other targeted measures, to mitigate the gender inequalities that are characteristic of capitalism. We pose that Citizen Income is the only available measure that is capable of simultaneously affecting what we take to be the two main sites of patriarchal-patrimonial domination: the domestic and corporate domains. Our republican argument promotes the inclusion of the concept of domination in gender studies, since that concept allows to solve the confusions that the best-known conceptual dichotomies generate, such as the production/reproduction dichotomy, which is politically irrelevant, and the public/private one, which is often used in an ahistorical way and lacking an institutional foundation.







