Translation, validity and reliability of the fall risk scale for older adults

dc.contributor.authorCossio Bolaños, Marco Antonio
dc.contributor.authorVidal Espinoza, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorCáceres Bahamondes, Javiera
dc.contributor.authorCastelli Correia de Campos, Luis Felipe
dc.contributor.authorUrzua Alul, Luis
dc.contributor.authorSilva Ramos de Lázari, Marcela
dc.contributor.authorLuarte Rocha, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorGómez Campos, Rossana
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-09T11:01:17Z
dc.date.available2025-01-09T11:01:17Z
dc.date.issued2024-08
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Falls in older adults are a common and serious threat to health and functional independence. It can cause psychological distress, inability to participate in activities of daily living, brain injury, fractures, and even death. The aim was to analyze the psychometric properties of the self-assessed fall risk scale (FRS) that measures the risk of falls in older adults in a central region of Chile, as well as to verify the concurrent validity against functional fitness tests. Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in 222 older adults (OA) [34 males and 188 females] with an age range of 65 to 85 years. The 13-item self-perceived fall risk scale (FRS) was validated. Anthropometric measures (weight, height and waist circumference) were assessed. Five functional fitness tests were measured (right and left hand grip strength, biceps curl, up-and-go, agility and 6-minute walk test). Validation was performed by construct validation [(exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)] and concurrent validity. Results: The EFA revealed 4 factors in the FRS scale [1: fear of falling (variance 27.1%), 2: use of assistive devices (variance 10.6%), 3: loss of sensation (variance 9.3%), and 4: limited mobility (variance 8.3%)]. Factor loadings ranged from ∼ 0.50 to 0.83 across the 4 components. The Kaiser-Meyer Olkin sample adequacy test (KMO) reflected adequate adequacy (KMO = 0.79, chi-square (X2) = 498.806, gl = 78, p = 0.00). The CFA showed a satisfactory final fit [chi-square (X2) = 126.748, Root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.042, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.946, Comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.935 y Normed fit index (NFI) = 0.90. The relationships between the FRS scale and functional fitness tests (right and left hand grip strength, biceps curl, up-and-go, agility and 6-minute walk test) ranged from low to moderate (r= -0.23 to 0.41). Conclusion: The FRS scale showed acceptable validity and reliability in older adults in central region of Chile. It is expected that this scale will be useful for assessing fall risk in clinical and epidemiological settings in the aging Chilean population.es_ES
dc.description.departmentDidácticas Integradases_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipRegular Fondecyt Project 1221708.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCossio-Bolaños, M., Vidal-Espinoza, R., Caceres-Bahamondes, J., de Campos, L. F. C. C., Urzua-Alul, L., de Lázari, M. S. R., Luarte-Rocha, C., & Gomez-Campos, R. (2024). Translation, validity and reliability of the fall risk scale for older adults. In BMC Geriatrics (Vol. 24, Issue 1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05292-8es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12877-024-05292-8
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318 (electrónico)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10272/24741
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.otherFall riskes_ES
dc.subject.otherValidityes_ES
dc.subject.otherReliabilityes_ES
dc.subject.otherFunctional fitnesses_ES
dc.subject.otherOlder adultses_ES
dc.subject.unesco3201.07 Geriatríaes_ES
dc.titleTranslation, validity and reliability of the fall risk scale for older adultses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s12877-024-05292-8.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión editor

Collections