Epidural Analgesia and Neonatal Morbidity: A Retrospective Cohort Study

dc.contributor.authorHernández Martínez, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Almagro, Julián Javier
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Cid García-Suelto, María
dc.contributor.authorUreña Barrajon, María
dc.contributor.authorMolina Alarcón, Milagros
dc.contributor.authorGómez Salgado, Juan
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-11T06:35:11Z
dc.date.available2019-04-11T06:35:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.description.abstractBackground: Epidural analgesia (EA), at the present time, is one of the most effective methods to reduce labor pain. In recent years its use has increased, being used between 20–70% of all deliveries; (2) Methods: Historical cohort on a total of 2947 deliveries during the years 2012–2016 at the “Mancha-Centro Hospital” of Alcázar de San Juan. The main outcome variables were four neonatal morbidity (NM) criteria: umbilical artery pH of <7.10, Apgar score at 5 min < 7, need for advanced resuscitation and composite morbidity. We used the multivariate analysis to control confounding bias. (3) Results: No statistical relationship between EA and the second stage of labor duration with none of the four criteria of NM used (p > 0.005). However, the type of delivery was associated with three criteria (pH, resuscitation, and composite morbidity). The instrumental delivery presented an OR of pH < 7.10 of 2.68 95% CI [1.15, 6.27], an OR of advanced resuscitation of 2.44 95% CI [1.17, 5.08] and OR of composite morbidity of 2.86 95% CI [1.59, 5.12]; (4) Conclusions: The EA and the second stage of labor duration are not related to the NM. While the instrumental delivery doubles the risk of NM compared to the normal vaginal delivery.es_ES
dc.description.departmentEnfermería
dc.identifier.citationHernández Martínez, A., Rodríguez Almagro, J., García-Suelto, M., Ureña Barrajon, M., Molina Alarcón, M., Gómez Salgado, J. Epidural Analgesia and Neonatal Morbidity: A Retrospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2092. (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102092es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph15102092
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10272/16172
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.otherApgares_ES
dc.subject.otherEpidural analgesiaes_ES
dc.subject.otherNeonatal morbidityes_ES
dc.subject.otherNeonatal resuscitationes_ES
dc.subject.otherUmbilical artery pHes_ES
dc.titleEpidural Analgesia and Neonatal Morbidity: A Retrospective Cohort Studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication93159467-aa6e-4dda-a463-d1a0bc4dee50
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery93159467-aa6e-4dda-a463-d1a0bc4dee50

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Epidural Analgesia.pdf
Size:
1.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión editor

Collections