Remediation of acid mine drainage and immobilization of rare earth elements: Comparison between natural and residual alkaline materials

dc.contributor.authorKotte Hewa, Dileesha Jayahansani
dc.contributor.authorDurce, Delphine
dc.contributor.authorSalah, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Cánovas, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorSmolders, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T11:58:30Z
dc.date.available2023-11-28T11:58:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-11
dc.description.abstractAcid mine drainage (AMD) is a well-known source of toxic trace metals in freshwaters. Traditional passive treatment systems rely on AMD neutralization with limestone and removal of most common toxic transition metals such as Cu and Zn with little attention to rare earth elements (REE). Alkaline waste materials now receive increasing attention as low cost AMD treatment alternatives in the circular economy. This study was set up to identify the efficiency of alkaline waste materials remediating AMD and scavenging REE in addition to other toxic trace elements. An AMD sample was collected from a lixiviate coming from pyrite heaps in the Iberian Pyrite Belt (pH =1.8, 30 μM ∑REY). The sample was treated with either blast furnace slag (BFS) generated during smelting of iron ore in a blast furnace or biomass ashes (BA) derived from combustion of biomass, thereby using analytical grade CaCO3, and NaOH as reference products. The batch alkalinization experiments were conducted by adding each alkaline material at an amount to obtain an equal pH to ≈6.5. The required amounts of the products were NaOH <CaCO3<BFS <BA in line with their acid neutralizing capacities. The largest removal of sulfate from water was obtained in the CaCO3 treatment suggesting gypsum precipitation which was lower with BA and BFS and virtually absent with NaOH, these trends were confirmed by SEM-EDX and XRD. Both BFS and BA removed more Fe than CaCO3 and NaOH. The REE elements were well removed by all treatments (>99%) and the remaining REE concentrations in the solutions were clearly lower than values for Cu and Zn. The Zn and Cu removals were not consistently high enough (except with NaOH) to meet environmental limits in the discharge waters. The largest efficiency for REE removals was obtained with CaCO3. Indirect evidence here suggests that gypsum is a better host for the trivalent REE than Fe(III) minerals in the precipitates. The ionic radii of trivalent REE are more similar to Ca2+than to Fe3+, explaining the better potential of gypsum as REE host. This study showed also the potential of BFS as alkaline agent for the remediation of AMD in terms of its higher alkalinity generation potential as compared to BA, thus making BA less promising than BFSes_ES
dc.description.departmentCiencias de la Tierra
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research has received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska- Curie Grant Agreement No 857989. C.R C´anovas thanks the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for the Postdoctoral Fellowship granted under application reference RYC2019-027949-I. The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable assistance of the following people as well: Dr. Raul Moreno Gonzalez from the Department of Earth Sciences, University of Huelva in Spain for assistance in collecting acid mine water samples; Dr. Quoc Tri Phung from SCK CEN in Belgium for assistance in obtaining BFS samples; Dr. Lander Frederickx from SCK CEN in Belgium for supporting in XRD analysis; Dr. Claudia Moens, Mr. Benoit Bergen and Ms. Kristin Coorevits, ICP-MS Team, Division of Soil and Water management, KU Leuven for their enormous assistance in measuring ICP-MS samples; All the technicians of the Waste and Disposal Group, SCKCEN for their assistance in various ways. Authors also thank ENCE Energía y Celulosa Company for providing the BAes_ES
dc.identifier.citationKotte-Hewa, D. J., Durce, D., Salah, S., Ruiz Cánovas, C., & Smolders, E. (2023). Remediation of acid mine drainage and immobilization of rare earth elements: Comparison between natural and residual alkaline materials. In Applied Geochemistry (Vol. 158, p. 105800). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105800es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105800
dc.identifier.issn0883-2927
dc.identifier.issn1872-9134 (electrónico)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10272/22648
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.otherRare earth elementses_ES
dc.subject.otherBiomass ashes_ES
dc.subject.otherAcid mine water remediationes_ES
dc.subject.otherPassive treatment systemses_ES
dc.subject.otherWaste productses_ES
dc.subject.unesco2506 Geologíaes_ES
dc.titleRemediation of acid mine drainage and immobilization of rare earth elements: Comparison between natural and residual alkaline materialses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9f9dd101-f69e-4c2c-8246-0f4dd7c71eb1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9f9dd101-f69e-4c2c-8246-0f4dd7c71eb1

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Remediation of acid mine drainage.pdf
Size:
6.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión editor

Collections