Effects of Cooperative-Learning Interventions on Physical Education Students’ Intrinsic Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Loading...
Publication date
Advisors
Department
Research group
Center
Abstract
The aim was to review the effects of cooperative learning interventions on intrinsic
motivation in physical education students, as well as to conduct a meta-analysis to determinate the
overall effect size of these interventions. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this
systematic review and meta-analysis. The PEDro Scale was used to assess the risk of bias and the
GRADE approach was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. A total of five studies fulfilled the
inclusion criteria and they were included in the meta-analysis. Effect size for intrinsic motivation
of each study was calculated using the means and standard deviations of the Perceived Locus of
Causality Scale (PLOC) before and after the intervention. The overall effect size for intrinsic motivation
was 0.38 (95% CI from 0.17 to 0.60) while the heterogeneity was large. Although four of the five studies
reported significant within-group improvements in intrinsic motivation, only three studies showed
significant between-group differences in favor of the experimental group. The findings showed that
program duration and participant age may be relevant factors that must be considered by educators
and researchers to conduct future effective interventions. Cooperative learning interventions could
be a useful teaching strategy to improve physical education students’ intrinsic motivation. However,
given the large heterogeneity and the low quality of the evidence, these findings must be taken
with caution.
Unesco Subjects
Bibliographic citation
Fernández Espínola, C., Abad Robles, M. T., Almagro Torres, B. J. ... Giménez Fuentes-Guerra, F. J. (2020). Effects of Cooperative-Learning Interventions on Physical Education Students’ Intrinsic Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124451














