La historia en Roma. Retórica, res gestae y crisis
Loading...
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Department
Research group
Center
Abstract
Los romanos comenzaron a estudiar su
pasado dos siglos después de los griegos,
y los escritores de finales de la República,
al menos aquellos que consideraban la
historia como una variedad del discurso
retórico, no tuvieron una opinión
favorable de aquellos pioneros, llamados
analistas, cuyos relatos eran el lado opuesto
del método retórico. Historia y retórica,
historia remota o historia reciente, discurso
libre o complaciente, recitatio o declamatio,
en fin, el declive de la historiografía
tradicional, estos y otros temas son tratados
en el artículo que presentamos
At Rome, the study of the past begins two centuries after the greek historians did it, and the writers of the end of the Republic, at least those ones that saw the history as a part of the rethorical speech, have a no favourable opinion about those early authors, who were named as annalists and whose reports were the opposed view of the rethorical method. History and rethoric, early or modern history, free or indulgent speech, recitation or declamation, at the end, the decline of the historiography, these ones and others subjects are studied in this paper
At Rome, the study of the past begins two centuries after the greek historians did it, and the writers of the end of the Republic, at least those ones that saw the history as a part of the rethorical speech, have a no favourable opinion about those early authors, who were named as annalists and whose reports were the opposed view of the rethorical method. History and rethoric, early or modern history, free or indulgent speech, recitation or declamation, at the end, the decline of the historiography, these ones and others subjects are studied in this paper












