Functional fitness benchmark values for older adults: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorCossio Bolaños, Marco Antonio
dc.contributor.authorVidal Espinoza, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorVillar Cifuentes, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorCastelli Correia de Campos, Luis Felipe
dc.contributor.authorSilva Ramos de Lázari, Marcela
dc.contributor.authorUrra Albornoz, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorSulla Torres, José
dc.contributor.authorGómez Campos, Rossana
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-19T08:04:28Z
dc.date.available2024-04-19T08:04:28Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The use of normative values and/or standards of functional fitness in adults is relevant to overall health and well-being. The objectives of the study were: to identify the physical tests of the senior fitness test (SFT) that have been applied since its proposal and to describe the proposed percentiles according to age, sex and country. Methods: A systematic review study was conducted in the Pubmed and Scopus databases. As eligibility criteria, we considered the period from 1999 to 2022 that presented data on SFT test used in the population over 60  years of age and that described normative values through percentiles. MeSH were used as: (1) Physical fitness, Exercise test, Senior Fitness Test, Functional fitness, Cardiorespiratory fitness, (2) older adult, aged, (3) Reference standards, standards, standards of care. Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” were included. Data extracted from the selected studies included: year of publication, country, sample age, sample size, sample sex, fitness component. Results and discussion: Seven studies were identified in five countries (03 in China, 01 in Poland, 01 in Portugal, 01 in Spain and 01 in United States). The age range ranged from 60 to 103  years. The studies were conducted in both sexes. The study with the smallest sample size was by Chung et al. (China) with 944 participants and the largest number of participants was the study by Rikli and Jones in the United States with 7,183 participants. In general, no study was able to complete 100% (8 components) of the tests proposed in the SFT. Normative values were presented through percentile distribution (p10, p50 and p90) organized by age ranges. Males presented better performance in FPF tests than females in all tests. Since the first publication of the SFT until 2022, seven articles have been published in countries such as United States, China (three regional studies), Poland, Portugal and Spain. No study has published the complete battery with its eight components. The percentiles of functional fitness reflect decline with advancing age.es_ES
dc.description.departmentDidácticas Integradas
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from Fondecyt Regular Project 1221708 of the National Agency for Research and Development of Chile (Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCossio-Bolaños, M., Vidal-Espinoza, R., Villar-Cifuentes, I., de Campos, L. F. C. C., de Lázari, M. S. R., Urra-Albornoz, C., Sulla-Torres, J., & Gomez-Campos, R. (2024). Functional fitness benchmark values for older adults: a systematic review. In Frontiers in Public Health (Vol. 12). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335311es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335311
dc.identifier.issn2296-2565 (electrónico)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10272/23530
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.otherPercentileses_ES
dc.subject.otherSenior fitness testes_ES
dc.subject.otherFunctional fitnesses_ES
dc.subject.otherOlder adultes_ES
dc.subject.otherPhysical fitnesses_ES
dc.subject.unesco32 Ciencias Médicases_ES
dc.subject.unesco2410.10 Fisiología Humanaes_ES
dc.titleFunctional fitness benchmark values for older adults: a systematic reviewes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fpubh-12-1335311.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Versión editor

Collections