Omisión impropia y Derecho Penal (Acerca del artículo 11 del Código Penal español)
Loading...
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Department
Research group
Center
Abstract
Los delitos de omisión propios o impropios constituyen infracciones de normas preceptivas pero considera
los delitos propios de omisión como hechos penales que se agotan en la no realización de la acción requerida
por la ley, mientras que en los delitos impropios de omisión, al «garante» se le impone el deber de evitar el resultado.
Nos interesa aquí profundizar en el fundamento de la situación omisiva cuando el autor ha provocado el perjuicio
de un bien jurídico mediante una inactividad corporal teniendo obligación de evitar tal daño
All crimes of omission constitute infractions of preceptive rules, but consider crimes proper of omission criminal acts which are enacted by the non-realisation of the action which is required by law, while in crimes improper of omission, the «guarantor» is under an obligation to avoid the outcome. We are now paying attention to the omission which occurs when the offender brings about damage to a legal entity by means of corporal inactivity and there was a duty to avoid the prejudice
All crimes of omission constitute infractions of preceptive rules, but consider crimes proper of omission criminal acts which are enacted by the non-realisation of the action which is required by law, while in crimes improper of omission, the «guarantor» is under an obligation to avoid the outcome. We are now paying attention to the omission which occurs when the offender brings about damage to a legal entity by means of corporal inactivity and there was a duty to avoid the prejudice












