Communicating Health Information at the End of Life: The Caregivers’ Perspectives
Loading...
Publication date
Advisors
Department
Research group
Center
Abstract
Health information and communication are key elements that allow patients and family
members to make decisions about end-of-life care and guarantee a death with dignity. Objective:
To understand caregivers’ experiences regarding health information and communication during the
illness and death of family members. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in Andalusia
based on the paradigm of hermeneutic phenomenology. Participants were caregivers who had
accompanied a family member at the end of life for over 2 months and less than 2 years. Five nominal
groups and five discussion groups were established, and 41 in-depth interviews with 123 participants
were conducted. Atlas.ti 7.0 software was used to analyze the discourses. A comprehensive reading
was carried out along with a second reading. The most relevant units of meaning were identified,
and the categories were extracted. The categories were then grouped in dimensions and, finally,
the contents of each dimension were interpreted and described given the appropriate clarifications.
Results: Four dimensions of the dying process emerged: di erences in caregivers’ perceptions of
information and communication, a conspiracy of silence, consequences of the absence or presence of
information, and the need for a culture change. Conclusions: Poor management of health information
and communication at the end of life increased the su ering and discomfort of patients and their
families. The culture of denying and avoiding death is still present today. A change in education
about death would better enable health professionals to care for patients at the end of life.
Unesco Subjects
Bibliographic citation
Ibañez Masero, O., Carmona Rega, I. M., Ruiz Fernández, M. D., Ortiz Amo, R., Cabrera Troya, J., Ortega Galán, Á. M. (2019). Communicating Health Information at the End of Life: The Caregivers’ Perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142469














