Comparison of Different Technologies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycles: Analysis of Concentrating Technology and Solar Integration
Loading...
Publication date
Advisors
Research group
Center
Abstract
This paper compares the annual performance of Integrated Solar Combined Cycles
(ISCCs) using different solar concentration technologies: parabolic trough collectors (PTC), linear
Fresnel reflectors (LFR) and central tower receiver (CT). Each solar technology (i.e. PTC, LFR
and CT) is proposed to integrate solar energy into the combined cycle in two different ways.
The first one is based on the use of solar energy to evaporate water of the steam cycle by means
of direct steam generation (DSG), increasing the steam production of the high pressure level of
the steam generator. The other one is based on the use of solar energy to preheat the pressurized
air at the exit of the gas turbine compressor before it is introduced in the combustion chamber,
reducing the fuel consumption. Results show that ISCC with DSG increases the yearly production
while solar air heating reduces it due to the incremental pressure drop. However, air heating
allows significantly higher solar-to-electricity efficiencies and lower heat rates. Regarding the solar
technologies, PTC provides the best thermal results.
Unesco Subjects
Bibliographic citation
Rovira, A., Sánchez, C., Valdés, M., Abbas, R., Barbero, R., Montes, M.,Muñoz, M., Muñoz Antón, J., Ortega Ruiz, G., Varela, F. (2018). Comparison of Different Technologies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycles: Analysis of Concentrating Technology and Solar Integration. Energies, 11(5), 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051064











