Comparison of Different Technologies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycles: Analysis of Concentrating Technology and Solar Integration

dc.contributor.authorRovira de Antonio, Antonio José
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Consuelo
dc.contributor.authorValdés, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorAbbas, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorBarbero Fresno, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorMontes, María José
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Domínguez, Marta
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Antón, Javier
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Ruiz, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorVarela, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-06T11:12:56Z
dc.date.available2019-02-06T11:12:56Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the annual performance of Integrated Solar Combined Cycles (ISCCs) using different solar concentration technologies: parabolic trough collectors (PTC), linear Fresnel reflectors (LFR) and central tower receiver (CT). Each solar technology (i.e. PTC, LFR and CT) is proposed to integrate solar energy into the combined cycle in two different ways. The first one is based on the use of solar energy to evaporate water of the steam cycle by means of direct steam generation (DSG), increasing the steam production of the high pressure level of the steam generator. The other one is based on the use of solar energy to preheat the pressurized air at the exit of the gas turbine compressor before it is introduced in the combustion chamber, reducing the fuel consumption. Results show that ISCC with DSG increases the yearly production while solar air heating reduces it due to the incremental pressure drop. However, air heating allows significantly higher solar-to-electricity efficiencies and lower heat rates. Regarding the solar technologies, PTC provides the best thermal results.es_ES
dc.description.departmentIngeniería Eléctrica y Térmica, de Diseño y Proyectos
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors acknowledge the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness to ENE2015-70515-C2-1-R and ENE2015-70515-C2-2-R projects.
dc.identifier.citationRovira, A., Sánchez, C., Valdés, M., Abbas, R., Barbero, R., Montes, M.,Muñoz, M., Muñoz Antón, J., Ortega Ruiz, G., Varela, F. (2018). Comparison of Different Technologies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycles: Analysis of Concentrating Technology and Solar Integration. Energies, 11(5), 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051064es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en11051064
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10272/15914
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [ENE2015-70515-C2-1-R and ENE2015-70515-C2-2-R]
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subject.otherIntegrated solar combined cyclees_ES
dc.subject.otherParabolic trough collectores_ES
dc.subject.otherLinear Fresnel reflectores_ES
dc.subject.otherCentral receiver systemes_ES
dc.titleComparison of Different Technologies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycles: Analysis of Concentrating Technology and Solar Integrationes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication838d9379-17ff-4be9-8f91-c9e197c4b381
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery838d9379-17ff-4be9-8f91-c9e197c4b381

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison_of_different.pdf
Size:
8.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
versión editor

Collections